Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filters, or blood clot filters, are small devices designed to catch blood clots that may break free inside the deep veins of the body and travel toward the lungs.
The spider-like filters are implanted in patients who are at risk for a pulmonary embolism, when they are unable to take anticoagulants or when those medications have failed.
An IVC filter is a medical device that is often placed in a person’s body to prevent pulmonary embolus. Doctors use these devices when discovering blood clots in a person’s veins.
IVC filters are small, spider-like devices that are inserted into the inferior vena cava to intercept blood clots before they reach the lungs.
The devices are an alternative for patients at risk for pulmonary embolism (condition in which one or more arteries in the lungs become blocked by a blood clot), and are often used when anticoagulants are ineffective or contraindicated. IVC filters contain a number of legs or “struts” that extend out inside the inferior vena cava. You can also get information about Ivc filter lawyer or IVC filter lawsuits through the web.
IVC filter recipients have reported suffering the following complications:
- IVC Filter Fracture
- Perforation, Puncture or Serious Damage to the Heart, Lungs or Vena Cava
- Internal Bleeding
- Cardiac or Pericardial Tamponade
- Ventricle Tachycardia
- Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Hematoma or Nerve Injury at the Puncture Site
- Constant and Severe Pain in the Heart, Chest or Elsewhere in the Body
- Pulmonary Embolism
It is essential that patients and their treating physicians be educated about this previously under recognized and potentially life-threatening complication of these devices. Armed with this knowledge, educated patients can be alert to the presence of pleuritic chest pain and other symptoms that should prompt immediate evaluation.
Such early awareness and evaluation could certainly be life saving. In addition, the propensity for filter fragmentation may be directly related to the duration of implantation. Patients and their physicians should be educated about this fact so that they have the opportunity to consider having the filter removed,” the authors wrote in their report.